More MPAA moves to stop File Sharing
Posted in Uncategorized on February 25th, 2006 by NotaninjaOn February 23, 2006 the MPAA issued a press release about various takedown targets to stop file sharing.
Sadly, they are targeting indexing sites, which will essentially do nothing but mildly inconvenience a few people in their search for a specific file. These files are all still out there.
Probably the largest target was the Razorback2 network of eDonkey servers. A few of the articles I have seen talk about how many users and files these servers had stored. Sadly, they all miss the point. These were strictly index servers. They pointed a user to other users with the same file. Which means that at most they incovenienced users who, instead of connecting to a Razorback server, were automatically connected to a different index server and then went about their business.
Every time they target one of the major index sites, several others spring up to replace them. The battle keeps escalating, with the MPAA always at least one step behind. They took down Napster for storing data centrally, up springs several alternatives that no longer do that. They start taking down public index websites and several spring up that require registration. They take down indexing websites and the people turn to non-indexed search methods. Yes, it may make it a little bit more difficult for the truly casual user, but if someone really wants to find something they can still turn to their favorite web search engine or go back to the old ways of getting things. Several spring to mind that I don’t believe have been targeted simply because they are not as easy to use.
I would also argue that all the publicity they generate with their takedowns and lawsuits is detrimental in that the general public finds out that such sites exist. I know that I was barely aware of Napster prior to the lawsuits.
And since I’m having a difficult time closing this, I’ll steal the ending from an article on Ars Technica:
Is the MPAA fighting a battle it can’t hope to win? It depends on the victory conditions. Certainly many of these web sites will be replaced with others, and life will go on; this has happened more than once before in the wake of a major torrent search-site takedown. Of course, most are in agreement that even if the MPAA’s aggressive legal tactics finally manage to put the public realm of piracy under close watch, users will simply move towards private file sharing networks that will allow them to evade detection and unwanted snooping. One must ask, however, if this is not the point. If piracy cannot be eliminated, driving it underground may seem like the next best option.
Although the MPAA’s frustration with piracy facilitators is understandable, the MPAA could better serve its own interests by working to establish a legal alternative to file sharing that can provide consumers with flexible and affordable Internet content delivery capable of meeting the needs of modern consumers.